The re-keying problem: how disconnected tools waste hours

The short answer: re-keying is typing the same information into a second (or third) system because your tools don't share it — and it's one of the largest hidden costs in most businesses. It wastes hours every week and quietly introduces errors, all because two systems that should talk to each other don't.

How much does re-keying really cost?

Do the maths on a single example. A booking gets re-entered into three systems — the operational tool, the CRM, the accounting software — at five minutes each. Say that happens twenty times a day. That's five hours a day of pure re-typing. Over a year, that's more than a thousand hours, on one workflow.

Most businesses have several workflows like that. The orders that get keyed twice. The customer details that live in three places. The timesheets copied from a spreadsheet into payroll. None of them feels like much on its own, which is exactly the problem. Re-keying is rarely counted, but when you actually count it, the number tends to stop owners in their tracks.

That's the same hidden-cost dynamic behind why your business tools don't talk — the tax is real, it's just spread so thin no one adds it up.

Aren't the errors worse than the wasted time?

Often, yes. Every manual re-entry is a chance to fat-finger a number, skip a field, or update one copy and forget the others. Then two systems disagree, someone acts on the wrong one, and you've got a problem that's expensive to trace back to its source.

So the re-keying tax isn't just wasted hours — it's a steady source of costly mistakes. A transposed digit in an invoice, a stock count updated in one place but not the other, a delivery address copied wrong. These don't announce themselves; they surface later as disputes, wrong shipments and awkward phone calls. We dig into that side of it in how integration cuts errors.

What does re-keying cost in real dollars?

Turn those hours into money. Say the person doing the re-keying is on a fully-loaded cost of $40 an hour. The single workflow from earlier — five hours a day of re-typing — is $200 a day, around $50,000 a year, on one process. That's a full part-time salary spent producing nothing except the risk of error.

Most businesses have three or four workflows like it once they look. Timesheets copied from a spreadsheet into payroll. Orders entered into both the store and the inventory system. Customer changes updated in the CRM but not the accounting software, or the other way round. Add them up and the re-keying tax often runs into six figures a year for a mid-sized operation — money that buys no capability, wins no customers, and simply leaks out through double-handling. When owners see that figure, the business case for connecting the systems tends to make itself.

Does re-keying affect my GST and payroll accuracy?

It does, and this is where it stops being merely wasteful and starts being risky. When timesheets are re-keyed into payroll by hand, a transposed figure means someone's paid wrong, super's calculated on the wrong base, and the correction takes real effort to unwind. When sales are re-keyed into Xero or MYOB, a missed or mistyped entry means your GST position is off — and that's the number you report to the ATO on your BAS.

So re-keying isn't just an efficiency problem; it's a compliance exposure. Every manual transfer between your operation and your financial or payroll systems is a point where the figures you're legally reporting can drift from what actually happened. Integration closes those gaps by making sure the number is only ever entered once, at the source, and flows through correctly from there.

Why does re-keying persist if it's so wasteful?

Because each instance is small and feels like "just how the job works." No one sits down to re-key for an hour straight — it's scattered across the day, a bit at a time, woven into tasks that also do other things. So it never presents as a single, obvious cost worth fixing.

That's precisely what makes it dangerous. A big cost hidden in small pieces is a cost no one ever decides to tackle, because at no single moment does it look big enough to bother with. It just quietly runs in the background, year after year, until someone finally adds it up.

How do you actually end it?

You connect the systems so data entered once appears everywhere it's needed — or you consolidate onto fewer tools that already share. Either way, re-keying simply has nothing left to do. There's no second system to copy into, because the first one already told it.

This is one of the highest-return fixes available to a business, for a simple reason: you're removing pure waste. You're not making people work harder or buying more capability — you're deleting a task that produced nothing but the risk of error. The hours come straight back, and the mistakes that came with them stop. If your stack has grown into a web of these hand-offs, the signs your tool stack has become a tangle are worth checking.

The honest first step

Finding your re-keying starts with tracing a single piece of information — a customer, an order — through your tools, and counting how many times it gets typed. That one trace usually reveals both the hours you're losing and exactly where connecting systems would win them back. It's a small exercise with an outsized payoff, because it turns an invisible cost into a number you can act on.

Related reading

• •Integrating your business systems: the complete guide
• •Why your business tools don't talk — and what it's costing you
• •How integration cuts errors across your whole business

Tell us what you run, and we'll show you what's possible.